The Reason Why You Would Select A Prime Lens Compared To A Zoom Lens?

pA regular quandary many new to photography struggle to work out is, precisely why would you pay out quite a bit of cash for a fixed focal length lens (also known as known as a prime lens), i.e. a 50mm, when you could have the outstanding variability of an 18-250 zoom at just about the same pay out? I myself found it tricky to figure out fixed focal length lenses at first. My first 2 lenses? The 18-55 f3.5 ndash; 5.6 and the Sigma 55-200 f4 ndash; f 5.6.So, why would you purchase a fixed focal length lens instead of a zoom lens? Well, without doubt there are no statutory guidelines on why you should, but one of the main valid factors is that a 50mm f1.4 prime lens (for example) will allow you to capture stills in much less light than the afore mentioned 18-55 f3.5 ndash; 5.6. This is for the simple reason of the wide aperture f1.4 capability of a lens such as this. In essence, consider that most primes have the capacity of a wider aperture than a zoom.nbsp;But for me, this would not be doing justice to what a prime can do. A fixed focal length lens for me represents nbsp;creativeness. When you go out to take pictures with a fixed focal length lens, you cannot zoom in or out, which means you are required to be imaginative with the focal length you will have. From then on, it is about framing the picture in an intriguing way, maybe using a different angle nbsp;instead of straight on, or making use of a wide aperture to blur the backdrop. I look at it this way, I would prefer to venture out with a fixed focal length lens and capture a couple of great photographs, than with a zoom and take a memory card full of everyday nbsp;photos I couldrsquo;ve got with any camera ndash; Prime lenses for me are why you buy a digital SLR.nbsp;nbsp;Check out some examples at;a title=Portrait Photography In East Kent href= target=_blankPortrait Photography In East Kent/anbsp;/p